The role of preoperative embolization in the treatment of intracranial meningiomas
https://doi.org/10.56618/20712693_2022_14_4_40
Abstract
The current level of development of neurooncology, as well as achievements in anesthesiology, have significantly improved the results of operations with hypervascular tumors of the brain, however, surgical treatment of intracranial meningiomas remains one of the most actual issues of neurosurgery to this day.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: was to assess the effect of embolization of the vascular network of the tumor on the results of surgical treatment of intracranial meningiomas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: a retrospective follow-up was carried out on 54 patients with hypervascular intracranial meningiomas who underwent hospital treatment in the neurosurgical department of the Stavropol regional clinical hospital from 2019 to 2021. The first group included 30 patients who underwent preoperative embolization of the tumor vascular network. The second group consisted of 24 patients who underwent microsurgical removal without preoperative embolization.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: the analysis of the results of treatment of patients with and without the use of preoperative embolization of the tumor network revealed the following key patterns: in the group of patients with PE, the average volume of blood loss was 322.41 ± 122.90 ml, in contrast to the second group, where this indicator reached 545.83 ± 147.38 ml (Student’s t–criterion, p < 0.001). Statistically significant differences were found when evaluating the results of treatment of patients according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS): in patients who underwent preoperative embolization, the median GOS score was higher than in patients of the second group (the median in the first group was 5 points, and in the second — 4 points, respectively (Mann-Whitney U-test, p < 0.001)).
CONCLUSIONS: preoperative embolization of the vascular network is an effective addition to classical microsurgical resection, which significantly improves treatment results by significantly reducing intraoperative blood loss, reducing the frequency of blood transfusions, and thereby improves treatment outcomes in patients with hypervascular meningiomas.
About the Authors
A. P. KornevRussian Federation
Alexey P. Kornev.
1, Semashko st., Stavropol, 355029
O. S. Belokon
Russian Federation
Oleg S. Belokon.
1, Semashko st., Stavropol, 355029
S. V. Ermakov
Russian Federation
Sergey V. Ermakov.
1, Semashko st., Stavropol, 355029
E. A. Grishko
Russian Federation
Elena A. Grishko.
1, Semashko st., Stavropol, 355029; 1, Pushkina st., Stavropol, 355017
References
1. Louis D.N., Perry A., Reifenberger G., von Deimling A., Figarella-Branger D., Cavenee W . K., Ohgaki H., Wiestler O . D ., Kleihues P., Ellison D . W . The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016; 131(6): 803–20. https://doi:10.1007/s00401‑016‑1545‑1
2. Ostrom Q.T., Patil N., Cioffi G., Waite K., Kruchko C., Barnholtz- Sloan J.S. CBTRU S Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2013–2017. Neuro Oncol. 2020; 22. https://doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaa200
3. Kukanov K. K., Vorobeva O . M ., Zabrodskayа Yu.M., Potemkina E . G ., Ushanov V. V., Tastanbekov M . M ., Ivanova N. E . Intracranial meningiomas: clinical, intrascopic and pathomorphological causes of recurrence (literature review). Siberian Journal of Oncology. 2022; 21(4): 110–123. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21294/1814‑4861‑2022‑21‑4‑110‑123
4. Tigliev G . S., Olyushin V. E ., Kondrat’ev A. N. Intracranial meningiomas. SPb; 2001; 408. (In Russ.).
5. Al-Mefty, O., ed. Meningiomas. New York: Raven Press, 1991.
6. Endovascular embolization in the complex treatment of meningiomas. Inpatient replacement technologies: Outpatient surgery. 2007; 2:19–24. (In Russ.).
7. Borg A., Ekanayake J., Mair R., Smedley T., Brew S., Kitchen N., Samandouras G., Robertson F. Preoperative particle and glue embolization of meningiomas: indications, results, and lessons learned from 117 consecutive patients. Oper Neurosurg 73. 2013; 244–252. https://doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000187
8. Chen L., D-h L., Lu Y-h., Hao B., Y-q C. Preoperative embolization versus direct surgery of meningiomas: a meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2019; 128(6):62–68. https://doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.223
9. Shah A.H., Patel N., Raper D . M . [et al.] The role of preoperative embolization for intracranial meningiomas. J. Neurosurg. 2013; 119(2):364–372. https://doi:10.3171/2013.3.JNS121328
10. Lanzino G. Embolization of meningiomas. J. Neurosurg. 2013; 119(2):362–363. https://doi:10.3171/2013.2.JNS121860
11. Zhao L., Zhao W., Hou Y., Wen C., Wang J., Wu P ., Guo Z. An Overview of Managements in Meningiomas.Front. Oncol.2020; 10:1523. https://doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.01523
12. Goldbrunner R., Minniti G., Preusser M., Jenkinson M . D ., Sallabanda K., Houdart E., von Deimling A., Stavrinou P., Lefranc F., Lund-Johansen M. EA NO Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Meningiomas. Lancet Oncol.2016; 17:383–391. https://doi:10.1016/S1470–2045(16)30321‑7
13. Gruber A., Killer M., Mazal P. Preoperative embolization of intracranial meningeomas: a 17-yaers single center experience. Minimal invasive neurosurgery. 2000; 43:18–29. https://doi:10.1055/s‑2000–8812
14. Raper D.M.S., Starke R . M ., Henderson F. Jr, Ding D., Simon S., Evans A . J., Jane J. A . Sr, Liu K. C. Preoperative Embolization of Intracranial Meningiomas: Efficacy, Technical Considerations, and Complications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(9):1798–1804. https://doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3919
Review
For citations:
Kornev A.P., Belokon O.S., Ermakov S.V., Grishko E.A. The role of preoperative embolization in the treatment of intracranial meningiomas. Russian Neurosurgical Journal named after Professor A. L. Polenov. 2022;14(4):40-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.56618/20712693_2022_14_4_40