The use of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging in differential diagnosis of cervical myelopathy
https://doi.org/10.56618/2071-2693_2023_15_4_28
EDN: CDGTVG
Abstract
Cervical myelopathy is a serious modern challenge that requires careful attention. Clinical manifestations of cervical myelopathy are variable, from mild neurological disorders to tetraplegia. This results in the decrease of accuracy and delayed diagnosis, and therefore, poor treatment results. Currently, magnetic resonance imaging is the main method for diagnosing cervical myelopathy. Diffusion tensor imaging tractography is the most appealing method because of the more detailed visualization of spinal cord structure. Together with MRI Diagnostic Center in Tushino, we studied patients with cervical myelopathy in NGHCI NCC OJSC RZhD. For the first time, such parameters as fractional anisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient were used to evaluate tracts and perform their 3D reconstruction. Our research showed that these data correlated with the severity of clinical symptoms of myelopathy. This provided an opportunity for development of early and precise topical diagnosis of myelopathy, differential diagnosis with spinal cord demyelination, and could be used to improve the quality and results of patient management.
About the Authors
A. V. BaskovRussian Federation
Andrey V. Baskov.
2/1, bld.1, Barrikadnaya st., Moscow, 125993; 20, Chasovaya st., Moscow, 125315
I. F. Baygildina
Russian Federation
Irina F. Baygildina.
2/1, bld.1, Barrikadnaya st., Moscow, 125993
V. A. Baskov
Russian Federation
Vladimir A. Baskov.
2/1, bld.1, Barrikadnaya st., Moscow, 125993; 20, Chasovaya st., Moscow, 125315
G. A. Shiryaev
Russian Federation
Grigoriy A. Shiryaev.
95, Volokolamskoe highway, Moscow, 125310
V. E. Kim
Russian Federation
Viktor E. Kim.
2/1, bld.1, Barrikadnaya st., Moscow, 125993; 20, Chasovaya st., Moscow, 125315
References
1. Gushcha AO, Korepina OS, Dreval Md, Kireeva NS. A case of surgical treatment of multilevel cervical myelopathy associated with degenerative compression. Nervnye Bolezni. 2013;(3):39–43. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14531/ss2015.2.44–50.
2. Dreval’ M, Gushcha A. Laminoplasty in surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: literature review. Russian journal spine surgery. 2015;12(2):44–50. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14531/ss2015.2.44–50.
3. Zakharova N, Potapov A, Kornienko V, Pronin I, Fadeeva L, Gavrilov A, Oshorov A, Gorshkov K, Takush S. Assessment of brain neural pathways in diffuse axonal injuries using diffusion-tensor magnetic resonance tomography. problems of neurosurgery named after N. N. Burdenko. 2010;(2):3–9. (In Russ.).
4. Kulikova S, Bryukhov V, Peresedova A, Krotenkova M, Zavalishin I. diffusion-tensor magnetic resonance tomography and tractography in multiple sclerosis: a review. Journal Nevrol Psikhiatr Im SS Korsakova. 2012;112(2 pt 2):52–9. (In Russ.).
5. Lutsik A, Karpenko V, Bondarenko G. The clinicopathological variants and operative treatment of cervical myelopathy. Russian journal of neurosurgery. 2014;4:44–50. (In Russ.)
6. Potapov A, Goryainov S, Journalukov V, Pitskhelauri D, Kobyakov G, Pronin I, Zakharova N, Tanoyan A, Ogurtsova A, Buklina S, Melikyan Z. The long-associative pathway of the white matter: modern view from the perspective of neuroscience. problems of neurosurgery named after N. N. Burdenko. 2014;78(5):66–77. (In Russ.).
7. Shevelev IN, Gushcha AO. Degenerative Dystrophic Diseases of the Cervical Spine. 2008. (In Russ.).
8. Barkhof F, Calabresi P.A., Miller D. H., Reingold S. C. Imaging outcomes for neuroprotection and repair in multiple sclerosis trials. Nat Rev Neurol. 2009;5:5:256–266. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2009.41.
9. Ciccarelli O, Werring D, Wheeler-Kingshott C. et al. Investigation of MS normal-appearing brain using diffusion tensor MRI with clinical correlations. Neurology. 2001;56:926–933. doi:10.1212/wNL.56.7.926.
10. Cook C, Wilhelm M, Cook A, Petrosino C, Isaacs R. Clinical tests for screening and diagnosis of cervical spine myelopathy: a systematic review. Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011;34(8):539–46. doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.08.008.
11. Guan X, Fan G, Wu X, Gu G, Gu X, Journalang H, He S. diffusion tensor imaging studies of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systemic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(2): e0117707. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117707.
12. Hochman M, Tuli S. Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Review. Journal Article published in The Internet Journal of Neurology. 2005;4(1). doi.org/10.5580/2414.
13. LeBihan D. Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4:469–80. doi:10.1016/j.ics.2006.04.006
14. William F, Young, M. Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Common Cause of Spinal Cord dysfunction in Older persons. Am Fam physician. 2000;62(5):1064–1070.
15. Kazuki Chagawa, Shunka Nishijima, Tsukasa Kanchiku, Yasuaki Imajo, Hidenori Suzuki, Yuichiro Yoshida1, Toshihiko Taguchi: Normal Values of diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging parameters in the Cervical Spinal Cord. Asian Spine Journal. 2015;9(4):541–547.
16. Rima S. Rindler, Falgun H. Chokshi, James G. Malcolm1, Sheila R. Eshraghi, Mahmud Mossa-Basha, Jason K. Chu1, Shekar N. Kurpad, Faiz U. Ahmad. Spinal diffusion Tensor Imaging in Evaluation of preoperative and postoperative Severity of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Systematic Review of Literature. World Neurosurg. (2017) 99:150–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.11.141
Review
For citations:
Baskov A.V., Baygildina I.F., Baskov V.A., Shiryaev G.A., Kim V.E. The use of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging in differential diagnosis of cervical myelopathy. Russian Neurosurgical Journal named after Professor A. L. Polenov. 2023;15(4):28-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.56618/2071-2693_2023_15_4_28. EDN: CDGTVG