The significance of lateralization gradients as predictors of corticotropinoma localization
https://doi.org/10.56618/2071-2693_2023_15_1_63
Abstract
SUMMARY: Pituitary MRI with contrast enhancement is a standard method of neuroimaging, but, unfortunately, it can be uninformative in 30–50 % of cases when clarifying not only the presence, but also the localization of corticotropinoma. Inferior petrosal sinus sampling is the method of choice in the differential diagnosis of Cushing’s disease, and in addition, it can be used for the purpose of lateralization of pituitary adenoma. However, the lateralization sensitivity according to the latest data ranges from 54 % to 100 %, and these data may well serve as a starting point in choosing the side of intervention by a neurosurgeon, especially in cases where corticotropinoma is not visualized by MRI.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of lateralization gradients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: cohort single–center retro/prospective study of 53 patients with Cushing’s disease. In order to assess the localization of corticotropinoma, a number of indicators were calculated (lateralization and prolactinadjusted ACTH intersinus gradient). Catheterization results were evaluated in comparison with contrast-enhanced pituitary MRI data and intraoperative data.
RESULTS: the study of the lateralization and prolactin-adjusted ACTH intersinus gradient showed their low diagnostic accuracy. The correct lateralization of corticotropinoma in our study when assessing gradients did not exceed 56.9 %, which in essence does not differ from random guessing. At the same time, an MRI of the pituitary with contrast enhancement allowed to correctly establish localization in 77.4 % of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: lateralization cannot be used as independent predictors of tumor node localization and choice of intervention side.
Keywords
About the Authors
I. A. RudakovRussian Federation
Ivan Anatolevich Rudakov
Saint Petersburg, Akkuratov St. 2, 197341
A. V. Savello
Russian Federation
Aleksandr Viktorovich Savello
Saint Petersburg, Academician Lebedeva st. 6, 194044
V. Yu. Cherebillo
Russian Federation
Vladislav Yuryevich Cherebillo
Saint Petersburg, L’va Tolstogo str. 6–8, 197022
A. A. Paltsev
Russian Federation
Artem Aleksandrovich Paltsev
Saint Petersburg, Akkuratov St. 2, 197341
U. A. Tsoy
Russian Federation
Uliana Aleksandrovna Tsoy
Saint Petersburg, Akkuratov St. 2, 197341
E. N. Grineva
Russian Federation
Elena Nikolaevna Grineva
Saint Petersburg, Akkuratov St. 2, 197341
N. V. Kuritsyna
Russian Federation
Natalia Valeryevna Kuritsyna
Saint Petersburg, Akkuratov St. 2, 197341
References
1. Hirsch D, Shimon I, Manisterski Y, et al. Cushing’s syndrome: comparison between Cushing’s disease and adrenal Cushing’s. Endocrine. 2018;62(3):712–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020–018–1709-y
2. Lodish MB, Keil MF, Stratakis CA. Cushing’s Syndrome in Pediatrics: An Update. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2018;47(2):451–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2018.02.008
3. Nieman LK. Recent Updates on the Diagnosis and Management of Cushing’s Syndrome. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2018;33(2):139–146. https://doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2018.33.2.139
4. Moszczyńska E, Marczak E, Szalecki M, et al. The Effects of Sampling Lateralization on Bilateral Inferior Petrosal Sinus Sampling for Pediatric Cushing’s Disease — A Single Endocrinology Centre Experience and Review of the Literature. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2021;19;12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.650967
5. Cebula H, Baussart B, Villa C, et al. Efficacy of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing’s disease in 230 patients with positive and negative MRI. Acta Neurochirurgica. 2017;9;159(7):1227–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701 017 3140 1
6. Chatain, Grégoire P., Nicholas Patronas, et al. Potential Utility of FLAIR in MRI-Negative Cushing’s Disease. Journal of Neurosurgery 2018;129(3):620–28. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.4.jns17234
7. Vitale G, Tortora F, Baldelli R, et al. A.B.C. Group. Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging in Cushing’s disease. Endocrine. 2017;55(3):691– 696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020–016–1038-y
8. Ghorbani M, Akbari H, Griessenauer CJ, et al. Lateralization of inferior petrosal sinus sampling in Cushing’s disease correlates with cavernous sinus venous drainage patterns, but not tumor lateralization. Heliyon. 2020;22;6(10): e05299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05299
9. Cavalcante LBCP, Freitas TC, Musolino NRC, et al. High accuracy of bilateral and simultaneous petrosal sinus sampling with desmopressin for the differential diagnosis of pediatric ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. Pituitary. 2020;25;23(5):507–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11102020010511
10. Chen S, Chen K, Lu L, et al. The effects of sampling lateralization on bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling and desmopressin stimulation test for pediatric Cushing’s disease. Endocrine 2019;63(3):582–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020–018–1779-x
11. Lefournier V, Martinie M, Vasdev A, et al. Accuracy of Bilateral Inferior Petrosal or Cavernous Sinuses Sampling in Predicting the Lateralization of Cushing’s Disease Pituitary Microadenoma: Influence of Catheter Position and Anatomy of Venous Drainage. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & amp; Metabolism. 2003;88(1):196–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2002–020374
12. Bertagna X, Guignat L, Groussin L, et al. Cushing’s disease. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009;23(5):607–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2009.06.001
13. Teramoto A, Yoshida Y, Sanno N, et al. Cavernous sinus sampling in patients with adrenocorticotrophic hormone-dependent Cushing’s syndrome with emphasis on inter- and intracavernous adrenocorticotrophic hormone gradients. J Neurosurg. 1998;89(5):762–8. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.89.5.0762
14. Doppman JL, Nieman LK, Chang R, et al. Selective venous sampling from the cavernous sinuses is not a more reliable technique than sampling from the inferior petrosal sinuses in Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995;80(8):2485–2489. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.80.8.2485
15. Mamelak AN. Venous angiography is needed to interpret inferior petrosal sinus and cavernous sinus sampling data for lateralizing adrenocorticotropin-secreting adenomas. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & amp; Metabolism. 1996;1;81(2):475–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.81.2.475
16. Jarial KDS, Bhansali A, Mukherjee KK, et al. Prolactin-adjusted ACTH Ratio in Predicting Lateralization of ACTH Source During Simultaneous Bilateral Inferior Petrosal Sinus Sampling in Patients with Cushing’s Disease. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2019;23(1):56– 59. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijem.ijem_486_18
17. Qiao X, Ye H, Zhang X, et al. The value of prolactin in inferior petrosal sinus sampling with desmopressin stimulation in Cushing’s disease. Endocrine. 2014;17;48(2):644–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s1202001403383
18. Mulligan GB, Faiman C, Gupta M, et al. Prolactin measurement during inferior petrosal sinus sampling improves the localization of pituitary adenomas in Cushing’s disease. Clin Endocrinol. 2012;77(2):268–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365–2265.2012.04339.x
19. Wind JJ, Lonser RR, Nieman LK, et al. The lateralization accuracy of inferior petrosal sinus sampling in 501 patients with Cushing’s disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(6):2285–93. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012–3943
20. Andereggen L, Mariani L, Beck J, et al. Lateral one-third gland resection in Cushing patients with failed adenoma identification leads to low remission rates: long-term observations from a small, single-center cohort. Acta Neurochirurgica. 2021;3;163(11):3161–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701021048302
Review
For citations:
Rudakov I.A., Savello A.V., Cherebillo V.Yu., Paltsev A.A., Tsoy U.A., Grineva E.N., Kuritsyna N.V. The significance of lateralization gradients as predictors of corticotropinoma localization. Russian Neurosurgical Journal named after Professor A. L. Polenov. 2023;15(1):63-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.56618/2071-2693_2023_15_1_63