Preview

Russian Neurosurgical Journal named after Professor A. L. Polenov

Advanced search

Recurrent metastatic brain damage in breast cancer: predictors, prognosis, local control

https://doi.org/10.56618/2071-2693_2023_15_1_115

Abstract

ABSTRACT. In 31–48 % of patients treated for brain metastases in breast cancer, a recurrence of cerebral metastatic lesion develops. A targeted study of recurrent metastatic intracranial lesions in breast cancer aimed at adapting subtypespecific and morphospecific both local and systemic treatment is currently most relevant and has undoubted practical interest.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY. The study is aimed at determining the nature of recurrent cerebral metastases depending on the method of local first-line exposure, the biological subtype of the tumor, and the morphological properties of the cerebral metastatic process.

MATERIAL AND METHODS. The results of examination and treatment were studied in 162 patients with breast cancer metastasizing to the brain. Recurrent cerebral metastases were diagnosed in 50 (30.8 %) women aged 28 to 80 years. The first-line treatment included tumor resection surgery in 18 (36 %) patients, radiosurgical treatment in 23 (46 %) patients, and whole-brain radiotherapy in 9 (18 %) patients. Patients were stratified by the biological subtype of their primary tumor. All patients were examined according to a standard protocol, applying clinical and laboratory research methods as well as neuroimaging.

RESULTS. Recurrent cerebral metastases were diagnosed in 50 (30.8 %) women. The average age was 52.9±12.3 years. HR+ biological subtype of breast cancer was verified in 16 % (N=8), HR+/HER2+ in 36 % (N=18), and HER2+ and HR-/HER2- in 24 % (N=12) each. In 92 % of cases, metachronous brain metastases were revealed after an average gap of 60.9 months from the verification of the primary tumor. The dependence between the biological tumor subtype and the nature of the primary metastatic brain lesion was not statistically significant (p=0.106). When analyzing how the methods of primary local control influence the variant of a recurrent cerebral lesion, no statistically significant correlation was found (p=0.638). However, a comparative analysis between the studied groups showed significant differences in the nature of cerebral progression. The local recurrence was significantly more common (p=0.001) in the HR+ tumor group, while distant recurrence was inherent to the HR-/HER2- group (p=0.003). The first relapse-free period among all patients was 7.74±8.04 months. None of the biological characteristics specific to the primary tumor influenced the duration of the relapse-free period (p=0.09). The median overall survival in the total number of subjects was 28.5 (Q1 13.25; Q240.75) months. The comparative analysis between groups revealed significant differences in the overall survival rate. The latter was significantly higher in the HER2+ group (p=0.004).

CONCLUSION. Aimed at adapting subtype-specific and morphospecific treatment, both at the local and systemic scale, the study of a recurrent metastatic intracranial lesion in breast cancer is the most relevant option, which demonstrates evident practical efficiency.

About the Authors

D. R Subbotina
Federal State Budgetary Institution “Almazov National Medical Research Centre” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Subbotina Dar'ya Romanovna 



D. A. Gulyaev
Federal State Budgetary Institution “Almazov National Medical Research Centre” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Gulyaev Dmitry Alexandrovich



I. A. Kurnosov
Federal State Budgetary Institute N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Kurnosov Ivan Alexandrovich



I. Yu. Belov
Federal State Budgetary Institute N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Belov Igor' Yurievich



A. V. Kartashev
Granov Russian Research Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies
Russian Federation

Kartashev Artem Vladimirovich



I. V. Yakovenko
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation

Yakovenko Igor' Vasil'evich



N. K. Samochernykh
Federal State Budgetary Institution “Almazov National Medical Research Centre” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Samochernykh Nikita Konstantinovich



K. A. Sulin
Federal State Budgetary Institution “Almazov National Medical Research Centre” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Sulin Konstantin Andreevich



References

1. Lin, N.U. and E.P. Winer, Brain metastases: the HER 2 paradigm. Clin Cancer Res, 2007. 13(6): p. 1648–55.

2. Martin, A.M., et al., Brain Metastases in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study. JAMA Oncol, 2017. 3(8): p. 1069–1077.

3. Rick, J.W., et al., Systemic therapy for brain metastases. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2019. 142: p. 44–50.

4. Patel, A.J., et al., Factors influencing the risk of local recurrence after resection of a single brain metastasis. J Neurosurg, 2010. 113(2): p. 181–9.

5. Pessina, F., et al., Role of Surgical Resection in Patients with Single Large Brain Metastases: Feasibility, Morbidity, and Local Control Evaluation. World Neurosurg, 2016. 94: p. 6–12.

6. Kamp, M.A., et al., Incidence of local in-brain progression after supramarginal resection of cerebral metastases. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2015. 157(6): p. 905–10; discussion 910–1.

7. Kamp, M.A., et al., Proof of principle: supramarginal resection of cerebral metastases in eloquent brain areas. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2012. 154(11): p. 1981–6.

8. Brown, D.A., et al., Breast brain metastases are associated with increased risk of leptomeningeal disease after stereotactic radiosurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Metastasis, 2020. 37(2): p. 341–352.

9. Atalar, B., et al., Risk of leptomeningeal disease in patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery targeting the postoperative resection cavity for brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2013. 87(4): p. 713–8.

10. Elm’hadi, C., et al., [Meningeal carcinomatosis in breast cancer: from diagnosis to treatment]. Rev Neurol, 2017. 64(7): p. 319–324.

11. Slamon, D.J., et al., Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER 2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER 2. N Engl J Med, 2001. 344(11): p. 783–92.

12. Arslan, U.Y., et al., Breast cancer subtypes and outcomes of central nervous system metastases. Breast, 2011. 20(6): p. 562–7.

13. Holzer, I., et al., Receptor Discordance of Metastatic Breast Cancer Depending on the Molecular Subtype. Breast Care (Basel), 2020. 15(6): p. 648–654.

14. Jung, J., et al., Discordances in ER, PR, and HER 2 between primary breast cancer and brain metastasis. J Neurooncol, 2018. 137(2): p. 295–302.

15. Lin, N.U., et al., Sites of distant recurrence and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: high incidence of central nervous system metastases. Cancer, 2008. 113(10): p. 2638–45.

16. Колядина, И., et al., Роль биологической гетерогенности при рецидивирующем и метастатическом раке молочной железы. Архив патологии, 2018. 80(6): p. 62–67.

17. Cagney, D.N., et al., Breast cancer subtype and intracranial recurrence patterns after brain-directed radiation for brain metastases. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2019. 176(1): p. 171–179.


Review

For citations:


Subbotina D.R., Gulyaev D.A., Kurnosov I.A., Belov I.Yu., Kartashev A.V., Yakovenko I.V., Samochernykh N.K., Sulin K.A. Recurrent metastatic brain damage in breast cancer: predictors, prognosis, local control. Russian Neurosurgical Journal named after Professor A. L. Polenov. 2023;15(1):115-122. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.56618/2071-2693_2023_15_1_115

Views: 31


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-2693 (Print)