Редкий случай субэпендимомы спинного мозга с повышенной пролиферативной активностью. Случай из практики и обзор литературы

Спинальные субэпендимомы — это редкие доброкачественные (1–2% от всех новообразований спинного мозга), медленно растущие опухоли с индексом пролиферации Ki-67, как правило, менее 1,5% (WHO Grade I). Из-за редкой встречаемости данного типа опухоли и отсутствия характерных клинико-радиологических особенностей, в настоящее время имеется ограниченная информация об их предоперационной диагностике и оптимальной стратегии лечения. В данной статье представлен краткий обзор литературы по данной нозологии, а также редкий клинический случай спинальной субэпендимомы, отличительными особенностями которого является множественность поражения спинного мозга и повышенный индекс пролиферативной активности опухоли (Ki-67 6%).

1. Bansal S. et al. Ten years’ experience in the management of spinal intramedullary tumors in a single institution. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2013 Feb;20(2):292–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2012.01.056

2. Iwasaki M. et al. Thoracolumbar intramedullary subependymoma with multiple cystic formation: A case report and review. European Spine Journal. 2013 May;22(3):317–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586–012–2357–1

3. Wu L. et al. Surgical outcomes in spinal cord subependymomas: an institutional experience. Journal of neuro-oncology. 2014 Jan;116(1):99–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060–013–1256–6

4. Mikula A. L. et al. Subependymoma involving multiple spinal cord levels: A clinicopathological case series with chromosomal microarray analysis. Neuropathology: official journal of the Japanese Society of Neuropathology. 2019 Apr;39(2):97–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/neup.12543

5. Boström A. et al. Surgery for spinal cord ependymomas: outcome and prognostic factors. Neurosurgery. 2011 Feb;68(2):302–308. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0b013e3182004c1e

6. Smith A. B., Smirniotopoulos J. G., Horkanyne-Szakaly I. From the radiologic pathology archives: intraventricular neoplasms: radiologicpathologic correlation. Radiographics: a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America. 2013 Jan;33(1):21–43. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.331125192

7. Khatri D. et al. Subpial Cervical Subependymoma: Report of an Unusual Tumor with Review of Literature. Asian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2019;14(1):329. https://doi.org/10.4103/ajns.ajns_225_18

8. Wu Z. et al. Intramedullary cervicothoracic subependymoma: report of three cases and review of the literature. Journal of Orthopaedic Science. Springer Tokyo. 2015;20(5):927–934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776–014–0585–4

9. Moss T. H. Observation on he nature of subependymoma: an electron microscopic study. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology. 1984 Jan;10;63–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365–2990.1984.tb00341.x

10. Dario A. et al. Subependymoma of the spinal cord: case report and review of the literature. Journal of clinical neuroscience: official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia. 2001 Jan;8(1):48–50. https://doi.org/10.1054/jocn.2000.0794

11. Boykin F. C. et al. Subependymal glomerate astrocytomas. Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology. 1954 Jan:13(1):30–49. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005072–195401000–00006

12. Soleiman H. A. et al. Spinal subependymoma surgery: do no harm. Little may be more! Neurosurgical Review. Springer Verlag, 2019 Jun. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143–019–01128-x

13. Louis D. N. et al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathologica. Springer Verlag, 2016 Jun;131(6):803–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401–016–1545–1

14. Krishnan S. S. et al. Cervical Subependymoma: A rare case report with possible histogenesis. Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice. 2012 Sep;3(3):366–369. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976–3147.102630

15. Sarkar C. et al. Intramedullary subependymoma of the spinal cord: a case report and review of literature. Clinical neurology and neurosurgery. 2003 Dec;106(1):64–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2003.09.003

16. Зрелов А. А., Куканов К. К., Олюшин В. Е. с соавт. Эпендимомы спинного мозга: обзор литературы и случай из практики. Российский нейрохирургический журнал им. проф. А. Л. Поленова. 2015;7(3):66–71.

17. Do A. S.M.S. et al. Unusual Exophytic Appearance of Spinal Cord Subependymoma. World Neurosurgery. Elsevier Inc., 2019 Jul;127:302–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.270

18. Toi H. et al. Bamboo Leaf Sign as a Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Imaging Finding in Spinal Subependymoma: Case Report and Literature Review. Case Reports in Neurological Medicine. 2016 Sep;2016:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9108641

19. Krishnan S. S. et al. Cervical Subependymoma: A rare case report with possible histogenesis. Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice. 2012;3(3): 366–369. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976–3147.102630

20. Fu Y. S. et al. Is subependymoma (subependymal glomerate astrocytoma) an astrocytoma or ependymoma? A comparative ultrastructural and tissue culture study. Cancer. 1974 Dec;34(6):1992–2008. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097–0142(197412)34:6%3C1992:: aid-cncr2820340618%3E3.0.co;2-c

21. D’Amico R.S. et al. Subependymomas Are Low-Grade Heterogeneous Glial Neoplasms Defined by Subventricular Zone Lineage Markers. World Neurosurgery. Elsevier Inc. 2017 Nov;107:451–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.009

22. Jallo G. I., Zagzag D., Epstein F. Intramedullary subependymoma of the spinal cord. Neurosurgery. 1996 Feb;38(2):251–257. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123–199602000–00004

23. Nishimura H. et al. A Case of Rapidly-Progressing Cervical Spine Subependymoma with Atypical Features. Spine Surgery and Related Research. Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research, 2019 Jun;3(1):91–94. https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2018–0005

24. Al-Wahhabi B. et al. Multicentric glioma of the spinal cord. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 2009;6(5):495–499. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688699208995042

25. Wang Z. Y. et al. Comparative analysis on the diagnosis and treatments of multisegment intramedullary spinal cord tumors between the different age groups. Neurosurgical Review. 2012;35(1):85–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143–011–0345–2

26. Ebner F. H. et al. Management of intramedullary spinal cord lesions: Interdependence of the longitudinal extension of the lesion and the functional outcome. European Spine Journal. 2010 Apr;19(4):665– 669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586–009–1232–1

27. Sun J. et al. Seldom-segment versus multi-segment intramedullary spinal cord gliomas: a comparative clinical study. Science China Life Sciences. Science in China Press. 2019 Jun:62(6):862–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427–017–9400–7

28. Zhou S. et al. Neuroradiological features of cervical and cervicothoracic intraspinal subependymomas: A study of five cases. Clinical Radiology. 2016 May;71(5);499.e9–499.e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2016.01.017

29. Yuh W. T. et al. Spinal cord subependymoma surgery: A multi-institutional experience. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society. 2018 Mar;61(2):233–242. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2017.0405.001