Preview

Russian Neurosurgical Journal named after Professor A. L. Polenov

Advanced search

The role of MR morphometry of hippocampal subfields in the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment of various origins

Abstract

Cognitive impairment is a global medical and social problem, with a high prevalence in the population and a rapid increase in the incidence due to an increase in the number and life expectancy of older people. Currently, it is especially relevant to identify such causes of cognitive impairment as neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular diseases at the stage of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and even preclinical stages. The most common types of predementia are amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and subcortical vascular mild cognitive impairment (svMCI). The hippocampus plays an important role in the consolidation of information from short-term memory to long-term memory and consists of anatomically and functionally distinct subfields. however, at present, the features of atrophy of its subfields in MCI have not been studied enough. The aim of the study was to clarify the changes in the volumes of the hippocampus and its subfields using the example of MCI of various genesis in comparison with normal age-related aging. Three groups of 20 people were examined: patients with a MCI, patients with sv MCI and the control group. The paper analyzes the data of MRI morphometry of the hippocampal subfields in patients with aMCI and svMCI and compares them with normal age-related aging. Significant differences were found between the group of patients with aMCI and the control group, mainly in the volume of subiculum, presubiculum, molecular layer of the hippocampus, CA1 and CA4; between the group of patients with svMCI and the control group in the volume of subiculum, right presubiculum, molecular layer of the hippocampus, dentate gyrus and CA4. In contrast to svMCI, in aMCI, there is a significant decrease in the volume of the left subiculum by 21 %, the right subiculum, the left presubiculum and the molecular layer of the left hippocampus by 19 %, and the left CA4 by 17 %. The obtained data suggest that hippocampal subfields atrophy are determined already at the stages of aMCI and svMCI, and the distribution patterns of atrophy of the hippocampal subfields can be used for the differential diagnosis of MCI of various genesis.

About the Authors

I. K. Stulov
FSBI «V. M. Bekhterev National Medical Research Center of psychiatry and neurology» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Stulov Ilya Konstantinovich

St. Petersburg



N. I. Ananyeva
FSBI «V. M. Bekhterev National Medical Research Center of psychiatry and neurology» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Ananyeva Natalia Isaevna

St. Petersburg



L. V. Lukina
FSBI «V. M. Bekhterev National Medical Research Center of psychiatry and neurology» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Lukina Larisa Viktorovna

St. Petersburg



N. M. Zalutskaya
FSBI «V. M. Bekhterev National Medical Research Center of psychiatry and neurology» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Zalutskaya Natalya Mikhailovna

St. Petersburg



References

1. Firbank MJ, Barber R, Burton EJ, O’Brien JT. Validation of a fully automated hippocampal segmentation method on patients with dementia. Human brain mapping. 2008 dec;29(12):1442–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20480

2. Fung Y, Ng K, Vogrin S et al. Comparative Utility of Manual versus automated Segmentation of Hippocampus and entorhinal Cortex Volumes in a Memory Clinic Sample. journal of alzheimer’s disease. 2019;68(1):159–171. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-181172

3. Van Leemput K, Bakkour A, Benner T, Wiggins G, Wald L, Augustinack J et al. Automated segmentation of hippocampal subfields from ultra-high resolution in vivo MrI. Hippocampus. 2009;19(6):549–557. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.20615

4. Neznanov N, Ananyeva N, Zalutskaya N, Andreev E, Akhmerova L, Ezhova R et al. Neurovisualisation of the hippocampus: role in diadnostic of the early alzheimer disease. VM BeKHTereV reVIew oF pSyCHIaTry aNd MedICal pSyCHology. 2019;(4):3–11. https://doi.org/10.31363/2313-7053-2018-4-3-11

5. Jellinger K. The pathology of ischemic-vascular dementia. journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2002;203–204:153–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022–510x(02)00282–4

6. Shi Y, Wardlaw J. Update on cerebral small vessel disease: a dynamic whole-brain disease. BMj. 2016;1(3):83–92. https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2016–000035

7. Emelin A. Yu. Vozmozhnosti diagnostiki i lecheniya kognitivnykh narushenii na nedementnykh stadiyakh. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika. 2020;12(5). (In russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2020-5-78-83

8. Sanford A. Mild Cognitive Impairment. Clinics in geriatric Medicine. 2017;33(3):325–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2017.02.005

9. Levin O. S. Umerennoe kognitivnoe rasstroistvo: diagnostika i lechenie. effektivnaya farmakoterapiya. 2012(5):14–21. (In russ.).

10. Petersen R, Lopez O, Armstrong M, Getchius T, Ganguli M, Gloss D et al. Practice guideline update summary: Mild cognitive impairment. Neurology. 2017;90(3):126–135. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000004826

11. Visser P, Kester A, Jolles J, Verhey F. Ten-year risk of dementia in subjects with mild cognitive impairment. Neurology. 2006;67(7):1201–1207. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000238517.59286.c5

12. Petersen R. Mild cognitive impairment clinical trials. Nature reviews drug discovery. 2003;2(8):646–653. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1155

13. Seo S, Ahn J, Yoon U, Im K, Lee J, Tae Kim S et al. Cortical Thinning in Vascular Mild Cognitive Impairment and Vascular dementia of Subcortical Type. journal of Neuroimaging. 2010;20(1):37–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552–6569.2008.00293.x

14. Frisoni G, Galluzzi S, Bresciani l, Zanetti O, Geroldi C. Mild cognitive impairment with subcortical vascular features. journal of Neurology. 2002;249(10):1423–1432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-002-0861-7

15. O’Brien J, Erkinjuntti T, Reisberg B, Roman G, Sawada T, Pantoni L et al. Vascular cognitive impairment. The lancet Neurology. 2003;2(2):89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474–4422(03)00305-3

16. Skvortsov V. V., Levitan B. N., Golieva E.A., Malyakin G. I. Distsirkulyatornaya entsefalopatiya v deyatel’nosti vracha obshchei praktiki. lechashchii Vrach. 2021;(5):27–31. (In russ.).] https://doi.org/10.51793/oS.2021.49.39.006

17. Wardlaw J, Smith E, Biessels G, Cordonnier C, Fazekas F, Frayne R et al. Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration. The lancet Neurology. 2013;12(8):822–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474–4422(13)70124-8

18. Schultz C, Engelhardt M. Anatomy of the Hippocampal Formation. Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience. 2014;:6–17. https://doi.org/10.1159/000360925

19. Palomero-Gallagher N, Kedo O, Mohlberg H, Zilles K, Amunts K. Multimodal mapping and analysis of the cyto- and receptorarchitecture of the human hippocampus. Brain Structure and Function. 2020;225(3):881–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-019-02022-4

20. Duncan K, Schlichting M. Hippocampal representations as a function of time, subregion, and brain state. Neurobiology of learning and Memory. 2018;153:40–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2018.03.006

21. Augustinack JC, Helmer K, Huber KE, Kakunoori S, Zöllei L, Fischl B. Direct visualization of the perforant pathway in the human brain with ex vivo diffusion tensor imaging. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2010;4:42.https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00042

22. Gómez-Isla T, Price J, McKeel JR. D, Morris J, Growdon J, Hyman B. Profound loss of layer II entorhinal Cortex Neurons occurs in Very Mild alzheimer’s disease. The journal of Neuroscience. 1996;16(14):4491–4500. https://doi.org/10.1523/jNeUroSCI.16–14–04491.1996

23. Zhao W, Wang X, Yin C, He M, Li S, Han Y. Trajectories of the Hippocampal Subfields atrophy in the alzheimer’s disease: A Structural Imaging Study. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics. 2019;13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2019.00013

24. Nishio K, Ihara M, Yamasaki N, Kalaria R, Maki T, Fujita Y et al. A Mouse Model Characterizing Features of Vascular dementia with Hippocampal atrophy. Stroke. 2010;41(6):1278–1284. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.110.581686

25. Li X, Li D, Li Q, Li y, Li K, Li S et al. Hippocampal subfield volumetry in patients with subcortical vascular mild cognitive impairment. Scientific reports. 2016;6(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20873

26. Van De Pol L, Gertz H, Scheltens P, Wolf H. Hippocampal atrophy in Subcortical Vascular dementia. Neurodegenerative diseases. 2011;8(6):465–469. https://doi.org/10.1159/000326695

27. Pin G, Coupé P, Nadal L, Manjon J, Helmer C, Amieva H et al. Distinct Hippocampal Subfields atrophy in older people with Vascular Brain Injuries. Stroke. 2021;52(5):1741–1750. https://doi.org/10.1161/STroKeaHa.120.031743

28. Wong F, Yatawara C, Low A, Foo H, Wong B, Lim L et al. Cerebral Small Vessel disease Influences Hippocampal Subfield atrophy in Mild Cognitive Impairment. Translational Stroke research. 2020;12(2):284–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-020-00847-4

29. Scher A, Xu Y, Korf E, Hartley S, Witter M, Scheltens P et al. Hippocampal morphometry in population-based incident alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia: the HaaS. journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & psychiatry. 2010;82(4):373–377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2008.165902

30. Kim G, Lee J, Seo S, Kim J, Seong J, Ye B et al. Hippocampal volume and shape in pure subcortical vascular dementia. Neurobiology of aging. 2015;36(1):485–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.08.009


Review

For citations:


Stulov I.K., Ananyeva N.I., Lukina L.V., Zalutskaya N.M. The role of MR morphometry of hippocampal subfields in the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment of various origins. Russian Neurosurgical Journal named after Professor A. L. Polenov. 2022;14(2):153-159. (In Russ.)

Views: 43


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-2693 (Print)