Preview

Russian Neurosurgical Journal named after Professor A. L. Polenov

Advanced search

Clinical, surgical and rehabilitation aspects of meningiomas of the posterior cranial fossa

Abstract

   Summary. Meningiomas account for 37.6 % of all primary CNS tumors and 53.3 % of all benign CNS tumors. Dysfunction of the cranial nerves, cerebellar symptomatology, sometimes aggravated after removal of the tumor and require rehabilitation treatment.PURPOSE OF TH E STUDY: to evaluate the results of surgical and rehabilitation treatment of meningiomas of the posterior cranial fossa, taking into account the clinical and neurological manifestations, the volume and localization of the tumor, the degree of tumor resection.

   Materials and methods: The results of clinical examination, surgical treatment and rehabilitation of 66 patients with meningiomas of the posterior cranial fossa who were treated at the Department of Brain and Spinal Cord Tumor Surgery of the N. N. prof. A. L. Polenov for the last 3 years. Localization of meningiomas: 27 (41 %) – the posterior edge of the temporal bone pyramid, 8 (12 %) – the apex of the temporal bone pyramid, 15 (23 %) – the tentorium of the cerebellum, 9 (14 %) – the area of the greater foramen magnum, 6 (9 %)) – petroclival, 1 (2 %) – region of the cerebellar hemisphere.

   Results. All patients underwent surgical treatment: 42 (63.6 %) observations – total tumor removal, 17 (25.8 %) – subtotal, 6 (9.1 %) – partial, in 1 (1.5 %) case only biopsy of the meningioma of the greater foramen magnum, due to the involvement of the vertebral artery into the stroma of the tumor. After the rehabilitation treatment, a significant improvement in the state of the ICF domains was obtained: walking, self-care, dizziness.

   Conclusion. In most cases, meningiomas of the posterior cranial fossa can be removed totally without increasing neurological symptoms. In the event of a neurological deficit after tumor removal, rehabilitation treatment carried out in the early postoperative period can significantly reduce clinical symptoms and further continue treatment in rehabilitation centers. If the meningiomas are partially removed, it is recommended to carry out radiation therapy or stereotaxic radiosurgical treatment of the remaining part of the tumor. Patients after removal of benign brain tumors have a high rehabilitation potential, regardless of the location and degree of radicality of the neoplasm. Rehabilitation treatment is most advisable as early as possible from the moment of surgical removal of the tumor.

About the Authors

L. N. Maslova
“Russian Research Neurosurgical Institute named after prof. A. L . Polenova” – a branch of the Federal State Budgetary Institution “NMITs im. V. A . A lmazov” Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Lyudmila Nikolaevna Maslova

St. Petersburg



S. S. Kiiashko
“Russian Research Neurosurgical Institute named after prof. A. L . Polenova” – a branch of the Federal State Budgetary Institution “NMITs im. V. A . A lmazov” Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Svetlana Sergeevna Kiyashko

St. Petersburg



V. E. Olyushin
“Russian Research Neurosurgical Institute named after prof. A. L . Polenova” – a branch of the Federal State Budgetary Institution “NMITs im. V. A . A lmazov” Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Viktor Emel'yanovich Olyushin

St. Petersburg



S. V. Pustovoy
“Russian Research Neurosurgical Institute named after prof. A. L . Polenova” – a branch of the Federal State Budgetary Institution “NMITs im. V. A . A lmazov” Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Sergei Vladimirovich Pustovoi

St. Petersburg



N. E. Ivanova
“Russian Research Neurosurgical Institute named after prof. A. L . Polenova” – a branch of the Federal State Budgetary Institution “NMITs im. V. A . A lmazov” Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Nataliya Evgen'evna Ivanova

St. Petersburg



References

1. Huntoon K., Toland A . M .S., Dahiya S. Meningioma : A Review of Clinicopathological and Molecular Aspects. Front. Oncol. 2020;10:579599.

2. Tigliev G . S., Olyushin V . E., Kondrat'ev A. N. Intracranial meningiomas. SPb; 2001; 408. (In Russ.).

3. Magill S.T., Young J. S., Chae R., Aghi M . K., Theodosopoulos P. V , McDermott M. W. Relationship between Tumor Location, Size, and WHO Grade in Meningioma.Neurosurg. Focus.2018;44: E 4.

4. Voß K.M., Spille D. C., Sauerland C., Suero Molina E., Brokinkel C., Paulus W., Stummer W., Holling M., Jeibmann A ., Brokinkel B. The Simpson Grading in Meningioma Surgery: Does the Tumor Location Influence the Prognostic Value? J. Neurooncol. 2017;133:641–651.

5. Preusser M., Brastianos P. K., Mawrin C. Advances in Meningioma Genetics: Novel Therapeutic Opportunities.Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2018;14:106–115.

6. Huntoon K., Toland A . M .S., Dahiya S. Meningioma : A Review of Clinicopathological and Molecular Aspects. Front. Oncol. 2020;10:579599.

7. Louis D.N., Ohgaki H., Wiestler O. D., Cavenee W. K. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System; World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. 4<sup>th</sup> ed. International Agency for Research on Cancer; Lyon, France: 2016.

8. Lee Y.S., Lee Y . S. Molecular Characteristics of Meningiomas. J. Pathol. Transl. Med. 2020;54:45–63.

9. Huntoon K., Toland A . M .S., Dahiya S. Meningioma : A Review of Clinicopathological and Molecular Aspects.Front. Oncol. 2020;10:579599.

10. Marosi C., Hassler M., Roessler K., Reni M., Sant M., Mazza E., Vecht C. Meningioma.Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol.2008;67:153–171.

11. Zhao L., Zhao W., Hou Y., Wen C., Wang J., Wu P., Guo Z. An Overview of Managements in Meningiomas. Front. Oncol. 2020;10:1523.

12. Goldbrunner R., Minniti G., Preusser M., Jenkinson M . D., Sallabanda K., Houdart E., von Deimling A., Stavrinou P., Lefranc F., Lund-Johansen M. EA NO Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Meningiomas. Lancet Oncol.2016;17: e383–e391.

13. Aitmurzaeva A . N., Almukhumbekova M. S., Mombekov N. A . The problem of dizziness in neurological practice. KazNMU Bulletin. 2015; 2: 336–338. (In Russ.).

14. Vellutini E.A., Gomes Q . T., Cardoso A . S., Prevedello L . M ., Todeschini A. B., Prevedello D. M . Approach Selection and Surgical Planning in Posterior Cranial Fossa Meningiomas: How I Do It. J Neurol surg B skull base. 2019; Vol. 80(4):380–391.

15. Ruina E . A ., Gustov A . V . Characteristics of persistent disability in patients operated on for an extrachial intracranial tumor. Medical almanac. 2012;1: 170–174. (In Russ.).

16. Ostrom Q.T., Cioffi G., Gittleman H., Patil N., Waite K., Kruchko C., Barnholtz-Sloan J.S. CBTRU S Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2012–2016.Neuro Oncol.2019;21: v1–v100.

17. Agrawal Y., Carey J. P. Disorders of balance and vestibular function in us adults: data from the national health and nutrition examination survey, 2001–2004. Arch intern med. 2009; 169 (10): 938–944.

18. Neuhauser H. K. E pidemiology of vestibular vertigo. Neurology. 2005; 65: 898–904.


Review

For citations:


Maslova L.N., Kiiashko S.S., Olyushin V.E., Pustovoy S.V., Ivanova N.E. Clinical, surgical and rehabilitation aspects of meningiomas of the posterior cranial fossa. Russian Neurosurgical Journal named after Professor A. L. Polenov. 2021;13(4):65-71. (In Russ.)

Views: 63


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-2693 (Print)